This is a uniquely US consideration, made more ironic by the diversity of US society. It’s not a question found in any other western democracy who view diversity as a normal feature of the workforce and typically a strength. Mountains of literature endorsing the latter. What next? Well while we are using the term fearless… the article reads like people are just going to take this government instruction lieing down and oh what do. I’d say resistance and disobedience to any antisocial counter factual decrees from the federal government. Stand up, push back, lawyer up, use facts and talk in money words. All that is required for really bad and retrograde outcomes is for good people to do nothing.
This is a uniquely US consideration, made more ironic by the diversity of US society. It’s not a question found in any other western democracy who view diversity as a normal feature of the workforce and typically a strength. Mountains of literature endorsing the latter. What next? Well while we are using the term fearless… the article reads like people are just going to take this government instruction lieing down and oh what do. I’d say resistance and disobedience to any antisocial counter factual decrees from the federal government. Stand up, push back, lawyer up, use facts and talk in money words. All that is required for really bad and retrograde outcomes is for good people to do nothing.